Visual Rhetoric

Both articles, No Seconds and The Last Meal Project, were conceptually the same except they went about the issue in different ways. No seconds gave more personal information along with a higher quality picture of the food; In some cases lack of food. Where as The Last Meal Project gave less personal bios but a picture of there face in the background.

I felt like No Seconds had more power too it than the Last Meal Project even though you got to see the prisoners face in the article, I never felt sympathetic seeing a prisoners face. No Seconds had little personal bios that showed mistreatment from the prison and people who were denied such a basic right as the last meal and that had more of an affect on me personally. Visual rhetoric has much more power when complimented with text.

The Last Meal Project also seemed to be a lot less high quality because the pictures of the prisoners in the background were very low quality and the pictures of there food were side by side instead of on an actual plate, and they didn't seem to compliment the pictures on the back.

The Last Meal Project is undoubtedly more informative. they had little bits and pieces of facts about the death penalty throughout the slide show and No Seconds had a few facts spread throughout but nowhere near as much as the Last Meal Project.

Overall, Id say that No Seconds was more powerful because it used really bright colors and humanized the prisoners a lot better than the sketchy mug shots presented behind there food.